European Union leaders are contemplating a “reparations plan” that might use frozen Russian state assets to offer Ukraine with a $164bn mortgage to assist fund its reconstruction after the war with Russia ends.
Leaders expressed a combination of help and warning for the plan on Wednesday as they met within the Danish capital, Copenhagen, days after drones were spotted in Denmark’s airspace, prompting airport closures. Whereas the drones in Denmark weren’t formally recognized as Russian, different European international locations, together with Poland, Romania and Estonia, have accused Russia of drone incursions into their airspace in September.
Really helpful Tales
checklist of 4 objectsfinish of checklist
“I strongly help the thought,” Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen stated. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson additionally stated he was “very a lot in favour” of the plan. Others stated there might be authorized issues, nevertheless.
Here’s what we find out about Europe’s “reparations plan”, the way it may fit and what the response from Russia is prone to be.
What’s Europe’s ‘reparations plan’?
The reparations plan was first outlined by European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen in mid-September, and backing for it has grown as United States financial support for Ukraine wanes.
Throughout his 2024 presidential marketing campaign, US President Donald Trump promised voters he would pull the US again from offering excessive ranges of monetary and army assist to Ukraine.
For the reason that starting of his time period in January, Trump has made it clear the US will take a again seat when it comes to offering monetary help and safety ensures to Ukraine, indicating Europe ought to fill the hole as an alternative.
Europe’s plan would use Russian property frozen in European banks as collateral for a 140-billion-euro ($164.4bn) loan to Ukraine. Repayments for the mortgage can be recouped by way of conflict reparations from Russia, however the mortgage would even be assured both within the EU’s subsequent long-term finances or by particular person EU member states.
“We want a extra structural answer for army help,” von der Leyen stated on Tuesday. “That is why I’ve put ahead the thought of a reparations mortgage that’s based mostly on the immobilised Russian property.”
How a lot in frozen Russian property does Europe maintain?
About $300bn in Russian Central Financial institution property have been frozen by the US and European international locations since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Most of this – $246.9bn – is held in Europe, of which $217.5bn – the overwhelming majority in money – is held by Euroclear, a Belgium-based capital markets firm.
On June 30, Euroclear reported the Russian sanctioned property on its steadiness sheet generated $3.2bn in curiosity throughout the first half of 2025, a drop from the $4bn in curiosity earned over the identical interval final yr.
What are the challenges to this plan?
Underneath worldwide legislation, a sovereign nation’s property can’t merely be confiscated. Therefore, loaning this cash to Ukraine can be an infringement of Moscow’s sovereign declare over its central financial institution property.
Since many of the property are held in Belgium, the nation has requested for the plan to be fleshed out in case it’s required to return the property to Russia.
“I defined to my colleagues yesterday that I need their signature saying, ‘If we take Putin’s cash, we use it, we’re all going to be accountable if it goes incorrect,’” Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever informed reporters in Copenhagen on Thursday.
On Wednesday, von der Leyen stated: “It’s completely clear that Belgium can’t be the one who’s the one member state that’s carrying the danger. The chance must be placed on broader shoulders.”
Are any European leaders hesitant about this plan?
Sure. In addition to De Wever, different European leaders have expressed hesitation or have requested their fellow leaders to work out extra particulars of the plan earlier than they comply with it.
Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof stated the proposal ought to be thought of very rigorously, given the authorized and monetary dangers that would come up.
Others additionally signalled warning. “I feel that’s a troublesome authorized query,” Luxembourg Prime Minister Luc Frieden informed reporters. “You possibly can’t simply take over property that belong to a different state so simply.”
Frieden added: “There at the moment are different proposals on the desk, however these additionally elevate an entire host of questions. I want to have solutions to those questions first. Amongst different issues, how would such a mortgage be repaid? What would occur if Russia didn’t repay these reparations in a peace treaty?”
Is the plan prone to go forward?
Specialists stated European leaders would doubtless should discover a solution to make the plan viable because the prospects of additional US assist for Ukraine dry up.
“It’s going to occur as a result of with the US strolling away, Europe is left with $100bn-plus annual funding wants for Ukraine,” Timothy Ash, an affiliate fellow within the Russia and Eurasia programme at Chatham Home, informed Al Jazeera.
Ash defined that the larger problem for Europe can be to not go forward with the plan if it means leaving Ukraine underfunded typically and inserting it at increased danger of shedding the conflict with Russia. “Dangers to Europe would then be catastrophic,” he stated, together with the prospect of tens of tens of millions of Ukrainians migrating west into Europe.
If a Ukrainian loss within the conflict turns into extra doubtless, European nations can be compelled to ramp up defence spending to five % of their gross home merchandise (GDPs) a lot quicker than anticipated.
In June, members of NATO pledged to extend their defence spending to five % of their GDPs by 2035.
Such an acceleration “would imply increased finances deficits, increased borrowing prices, extra debt, much less development and a weaker Europe and euro”, Ash stated.
How has Russia responded?
Moscow has rebuked the EU plan, calling it a “theft” of Russian cash.
“We’re speaking about plans for the unlawful seizure of Russian property. In Russia, we name that merely theft,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov informed reporters on Wednesday.
Peskov stated anybody concerned in seizing Russian property “will probably be prosecuted in a method or one other. They are going to all be known as to account.”
He added: “The boomerang will very severely hit those that are the principle depositories, international locations which can be serious about funding attractiveness.”
Ash stated Russia may take authorized motion towards European international locations if the plan goes forward. Nonetheless, “it must elevate its personal sovereign immunity to have the ability to launch any such authorized motion. And a authorized motion by Russia would take years – a long time to conclude.”
Russia is protected by sovereign immunity, which is a authorized precept shielding overseas governments from being sued in courts exterior their very own nation. If Russia needs to legally pursue this, it might have to waive this immunity, which, in flip, would imply Russia is also sued or tried in another country.
Ash added that one other plan of action Russia may take can be to grab Western property underneath its jurisdiction, however this additionally doesn’t come with out challenges. “Russia has 10 occasions extra property within the West than vice versa,” Ash stated. “It’s simply extra susceptible by this channel.”
How a lot in Western property does Russia maintain?
Moscow stated the worth of all overseas property it holds is corresponding to the frozen Russian reserves held within the West. Citing knowledge from January 2022, Russia’s state-run RIA information company reported there have been about $288bn of property in Russia that would probably be seized by Moscow.
Nonetheless, Russian Central Financial institution information from 2022 present there have been $289bn in “by-product and different overseas investments” in Russia. By the tip of 2023, these overseas property had dropped in worth to $215bn.
Ash defined: “These property are all overseas property – not simply Western. [They include] Chinese language, Indian, Center East property. And most of these property are non-public – not state.”
