A federal excessive court docket in Abuja has dominated that the Nigeria Inter-Financial institution Settlement System (NIBSS) has the authorized proper to handle the nation’s financial institution verification quantity (BVN) database.
Justice James Omotosho delivered the judgment on Friday, declaring that NIBSS operations adjust to the Central Financial institution of Nigeria (CBN) Act and different related monetary legal guidelines.
The case arose after NIBSS, represented by senior advocate Wolemi Esan, took authorized motion to verify its authority over the BVN system. The corporate sued the Integrated Trustees of Digital Rights Attorneys Initiative, the CBN, and the Legal professional Common of the Federation.
NIBSS wished the court docket to declare that its administration of BVN knowledge doesn’t violate Nigerians’ constitutional proper to privateness or break any current legal guidelines. The corporate additionally sought a everlasting court docket order stopping anybody, together with the Digital Rights Attorneys Initiative, from difficult its position.
The financial institution settlement system argued that it has the facility to develop and regulate nationwide infrastructure for digital funds and fund transfers, which incorporates the BVN system.
Learn Additionally: NDPC fines MultiChoice N766m for privacy violation
NIBSS accused the Digital Rights Attorneys Initiative of repeatedly submitting lawsuits, both straight or by means of different events, difficult its authority and claiming it violates privateness rights.
The CBN supported NIBSS’s place by means of its counsel, Kofo Abdulsalam-Alada, who filed paperwork stating that NIBSS’s position in managing the BVN database is lawful, constitutionally accepted, and important for monetary safety and system stability.
The CBN’s lawyer cited Part 47(2) of the CBN Act (2007) and provisions of the Banks and Different Monetary Establishments Act (BOFIA) 2020 to verify the central financial institution’s authority to determine and regulate cost methods.
In his ruling, Justice Omotosho discovered that the BVN initiative doesn’t violate privateness rights and confirmed NIBSS’s authority to take care of the system.
He famous that the CBN’s regulatory powers are well-established in BOFIA 2020 and different related legal guidelines.
“NIBSS has the facility to handle the BVN. The court docket grants the reliefs of NIBSS as prayed,” the decide dominated.
The decide additionally issued a everlasting injunction stopping the Digital Rights Attorneys Initiative and every other events from difficult NIBSS’s administration of the BVN system.
Justice Omotosho concluded that the judgment is a “judgment in rem,” which means it’s binding on all individuals and entities until overturned on attraction.
A judgment in rem is a court docket ruling that applies to everybody, relatively than simply the events concerned within the lawsuit.
