The Senate has stated the disagreement between the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio and the Senate Chief, Opeyemi Bamidele, throughout a latest govt session was not an indication that the Senate is split.
There have been a number of reviews in latest days of a struggle between Akpabio and Bamidele because the pair squared up throughout govt session and needed to be separated in a near-blow change.
That was the second time the duo would have interaction in a struggle in as many months for the reason that graduation of the present legislative season.
Whereas each males have whispered what occurred amongst their shut colleagues and pals, the Senate has formally for the primary time acknowledged clashes amongst lawmakers will not be new.
Slightly, the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Yemi Adaramodu, in an announcement issued on Sunday, noting that it’s a part of the legislative course of.
Learn additionally: No crack in our ranks, says Senate amid reported leadership rift
He nevertheless stated the conflict was not as critical as was reported.
Adaramodu insisted that the reviews misrepresented normal legislative processes as indicators of inner discord.
He stated, “Our consideration has been drawn to numerous media reviews claiming that President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio and Chief of the Senate, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele clashed throughout an govt session lately convened to deliberate whether or not the Senate ought to proceed on annual recess.
“The reviews don’t comprise any iota of reality. In entirety, they misconstrue time-tested practices and traditions within the parliament worldwide, the place members, no matter their political leanings, leverage the devices of parliamentary debates, questions or interpellations to debate each initiative decisively and eclectically earlier than approval or authorisation.”
He argued that vigorous debate stays an indicator of parliamentary democracy and doesn’t point out disunity amongst members.
“The Senate, as our nation’s highest law-making establishment, just isn’t completely different in any approach. Like different parliaments, each invoice, movement and proposal is at all times subjected to intense scrutiny in our Chamber nearly every day.
“This entails strong debates to which members talk about and dissect each initiative earlier than the Senate purely within the curiosity of over 230 million Nigerians,” he stated.
Adaramodu burdened that the deliberations, whether or not in plenary or committee periods, shouldn’t be mistaken for private altercations or indicators of division throughout the Senate management.
“Whether or not within the chamber or committee room, debates on coverage points shouldn’t be misconstrued as altercations amongst members, neither do they counsel any crack within the rank of the management,” he added.
