106
The Excessive Courtroom of the Federal Capital Territory FCT has mentioned that the worldwide Passport of the fast previous Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, was not in its custody however within the custody of the Federal Excessive Courtroom, Abuja.
On the resumed listening to of the alleged cash laundering case instituted by the Financial and Monetary Crimes Fee (EFCC) towards the previous governor, Justice Maryann Anenih held that the courtroom would have thought-about the appliance for the discharge of the defendant’s journey doc if it had been to be in its custody.
The Decide mentioned on Thursday that even when the request to retrieve the worldwide passport had been to be granted, it could be of no impact for the reason that passport was not within the custody of the FCT Excessive Courtroom however with the Federal Excessive Courtroom, earlier than Justice Emeka Nwite.
The previous governor is dealing with comparable expenses at each the FCT and Federal Excessive Courts, Abuja.
He had filed an utility, requesting the discharge of his worldwide passport to allow him to journey in a foreign country on well being grounds.Purchase nutritional vitamins and dietary supplements
Counsel to the defendant, Joseph Daudu, SAN, had earlier submitted that the worldwide passport being requested was not within the custody of the Courtroom.
“A assessment of the Courtroom’s document revealed that the applicant had beforehand been ordered to deposit his worldwide passport and different journey paperwork with the registry of the Courtroom,” the decide mentioned.
“Nonetheless, upon additional enquiry and search carried out by the Courtroom, it was found that the mentioned worldwide passport was not presently within the custody of the Courtroom’s registry however with the Federal Excessive Courtroom.”
“The defendant even deposed to an affidavit himself, stating that his passport had been deposited with the Federal Excessive Courtroom in a bail earlier granted to him.
“The straightforward logic is that the passport can’t be with two completely different courts on the similar time. Because the defendant has admittedly deposited the identical with the Federal Excessive Courtroom, there isn’t any purpose to make any order right here regarding the utility.
“Courts don’t make order in useless and as such, this Courtroom won’t make any order that shall be in useless for the reason that passport in subject will not be with this courtroom however the Federal Excessive Courtroom.”
The defendant, in his utility, had additionally indicated that his journey paperwork had been with the Federal Excessive Courtroom.
Justice Anenih, after the ruling, adjourned the case to October 8, 9, and November 13, 2025, for continuation of the listening to.
The courtroom had, on July 8, adjourned ruling on the defendant’s utility to Thursday, July 17.
Daudu, SAN, instructed the courtroom that the appliance was dated nineteenth June, 2025, and filed on June 20, 2025.
“It seeks an order for the discharge of the first defendant/applicant’s worldwide passport by the registrar to allow him to journey for medical consideration,” he mentioned.
The counsel mentioned the appliance was supported by an affidavit of 13 grounds within the face of the movement and supported by a 22-paragraph affidavit deposed to by the applicant himself.
The EFCC Counsels had, nonetheless, filed a counter-affidavit, saying granting the request might delay additional proceedings.
Put up Views: 233
